Showing posts with label non-fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label non-fiction. Show all posts

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Survival of The Sickest - Dr. Sharon Moalem with Jonathan Prince

The first impression of “Survival of the Sickest” is that it’s a book that elucidates the positives of the diseases that ail the mankind. But the book really is about how our body works at a macro level of cells and enzymes (really, that is macro in the context of the book) and a micro level of the very basic genes that make us who we are.

The book traces the origins of certain diseases like diabetes, and why should such conditions be genetic in nature when evolution tells us that the genetic weaknesses of an organism should get eradicated over generations. Some of the theories are proven and accepted by the medical community. Some are not. Regardless, it still teaches a lay reader a lot about how the body works.

Subsequently, the book transcends to genetics with only a remote relevance to the premise proposed in the opening chapters. However this does not make the book a least bit boring, or uninformative. The language is lucid, and medical jargons are used as sparingly as possible. And when it is used, sufficient explanation is provided to ensure the reader does not feel lost.

In the end, the purpose of the book is to educate. It does not mean that having that knowledge will enable us to take steps to correct some flaws or avoid passing them on to our children. But it at least helps us be aware of how our body works, which is really the essence of the book, and helps us be prepared in the wake of a sickness. You still will have to go to a doctor if you fall ill. But if you are one of those people who are paranoid about the multitude of things that can go wrong with the body, reading this book will help you realize the incredible mechanism by which your body ensures that you are fighting fit as far as possible.

Had this been a larger volume, it would have been difficult to digest all the information. As it is, retention levels of details for such books are low. Therefore, the 200 odd pages of the book just about strike the balance between leaving the reader with a strong message by retaining his focus and concentration, and leaving the details which while would have been good to read, would not have added too much value for the casual readers.

As it is, this book ranks high in my list of recommendations.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Shane Warne: Portrait of a Flawed Genius - Simon Wilde

When you think cricket, and think of some names – you might think of several – Shane Warne is likely to be one of them. Shane Warne has given Cricket one of it’s finest moments with his “ball of the century”, which by no means is the only good delivery, or perhaps not even the best delivery that he has bowled. But it is a legendary moment nonetheless.

There are several cricketers who have penned their autobiographies, or have biographies written on them. But few would appeal to me as much as Shane Warne’s. For both the right and the wrong reasons! Shane Warne is of course a fantastic cricketer. The best ever leg spinner perhaps. And then, he is also the bad boy with respect to his flings, alleged drug intake for which he was banned from International Cricket, and then his bookie contacts which again led him to troubles. One way or the other, he is one of those, love them or hate them but can’t ignore them characters.

Shane Warne is one of those happy go lucky guys who goes all out in the spirit of being happy go lucky. Perhaps that is the greatest flaw that he had. Drawing a line. But then, what would Shane Warne be if he started drawing lines. Would he have reached 600+ test wickets if he had? How much of a rebel streak that he had enabled him to achieve that in the first place. And how much of that streak was an excess? Guess there is no way to find out.

The biography charts out his career, and his personal life along with it with satisfactory details. A good thing is that the author does not present it like a history book or a Wikipedia entry. The book therefore is an entertaining read, providing glimpses into Shane Warne’s life, that one might not have otherwise. Another highlight of the book is that that author does not choose to harp either on the flaws part of the title, or the genius part. Facts and inferences are presented as they bear out. The lack of bias is refreshing. If one wanted a biased opinion, the book might as well have been a collection of tabloid articles on Shane Warne’s life. The author does a fair, balanced job of presenting Shane Warne’s life to us.

I wish that the book was written post-IPL first season, where Shane Warne shepherded his team to a victory – a brilliant feat considering that everyone had written them off for the kind of team Shane Warne had with Rajasthan Royals. That one tournament gave a fresh air to a fiery discussion about the tag line closely associated with Warney – ‘the best captain Australia never had’. It would have been nice to have a chapter on this episode in the book.

The book is not too long or boring to tire you out with needless details. And therefore it is a good read for anyone who enjoys cricket. I certainly enjoyed it.

Friday, February 5, 2010

Bad Science - Ben Goldacre

Who thought that a rebel scientist could write an entertaining book? But here it is, Bad Science, in all its paperback glory.

First up, let me be clear: Ben Goldacre is not a person against simple, logical things which promote good living. He fully advocates things like exercise and a balanced diet and abhors smoking and excessive alcohol consumption. What he has a problem with, to generalize, are people who claim outrageous things under the pretext of science. And that, as any common man would be vaguely aware, is so common place that it’s hard to discern the good science from the bad.

The writer starts with relatively harmless hoaxes like brain gym, a concept apparently prevalent in toddlers-schools in UK, and some strange, detoxifying foot massager. And then ups his ante to take on homeopathy. I could say he got personal. I have been on homeopathy medicine all my life. As of this moment, I have a bottle of a medicine called Cory-C, which is a clear liquid to be consumed orally, for curing common cold. I have been having it for 10 years now. It hasn’t helped my cold one bit. But I continue having it. But that’s because it tastes exactly like Vodka. I love this medicine!

Then we go on to crazy nutritionists, pill peddlers, and even modern medicine. The extent of domains he covers itself should convince you that he is not for or against anything as a concept in particular. The only thing Ben Goldacre relentlessly demands through the book is a systematic, honest search for cures for ailments of the human race. He constantly points out the role of the insensitive and ill-informed media, and at times ruling political leaders, for creating mass hysteria or hype about things that, at best, do not warrant any attention, and at worse, cause needless deaths in thousands. The AIDS fiasco in South Africa being the case in point; that one chapter, much more than the MMR episode that Ben Goldacre seems so passionate about, highlights the grimness and far reaching effect of “Bad Science”. Ben Goldacre writes that if he were not writing a light, humorous book, he would have been really, really angry. I couldn’t help feeling angry even though it was a light, humorous book that I was reading.

The best chapter of the book is definitely “Bad Stats” for me. The writer took me by surprise by his keen sense of understanding of statistics. Numbers can be misleading if you are determined to make them tell a story that they don’t really convey. And there are examples of how statistics are twisted to convey pre-determined inferences. Do that, and perfectly good science gets twisted to be bad.

This book will definitely open up your eyes to a lot of bull-shit, you wouldn’t believe how much, that goes on in this world. And while you probably will not go to the extent that Goldacre goes to validate, or repudiate, any of the gazillion claims of fat reduction, or hair growth, or memory enhancement that the latest new medicines make in newspapers you believe in, you will at least gain some intuition as to what is wrong with those claims. That perspective itself is the biggest take away from this book.

Monday, December 28, 2009

Liar's Poker - Michael Lewis

Liar’s Poker is an extended autobiographical essay of a misplaced investment banker. A BA in art history and masters in economics from London School of Econmics speak volumes about the utter confusion of what kind of a career he wanted to pursue. It’s a battle everyone can relate with it.
The book traces the journey of Michael Lewis from him joining Salomon Brothers as a trainee to his exit after establishing himself as a “Big Swinging Dick”. And along with his own journey, the author provides insights into the chaotic world within Salomon Brothers. Right from the rise of the company along with the mortgage bond market in the early 80s, and it’s opportunity loss during the junk bond bubble during late 80s. Even if as a reader you’re not financially savvy, you do not need to feel intimidated by the book, because Liar’s Poker does a brilliant job of keeping things simple.
The book is essentially about the people in the whole crazy financial world. It talks about the things that the people go through, right through the value chain. It talks about the graduation of a worthless trainee to a gawky geek to a mature man, eventually to the ultimate coveted title – “Big Swinging Dick”. The author does a brilliant job of showing the human side to the those ridiculously rich investment bankers. Well, a lot of them do not have a human side, as it turns out. Their greediness is as innate to them as the stereotype of a investment banker makes it out to be. But then, there are some, who do not start out the journey that way. Especially the kind of people who have art degrees. Sure they get corrupted with so much money flowing around, and so many money hungry people telling them the things they should be doing. ‘One-bad-apple’ phenomena. But these humans amidst the vultures is what makes Liar’s Poker a great story.
You will love this book if you have anything to do with the world of finance. May be you can identify with one of the guys in it. If you are one of the greedy folks, well, that doesn’t make you a bad guy. You probably still have a lot of people who look up to you. So don’t take anything written in this book about traders and bond salesmen and equities brokers and others too personally. Read it for what it is. A series of facts and one man’s opinion on them.
And even if you do not have anything do with the world of finance, but are enamored with the houses that the investment bankers live in and the cars they drive, you definitely should read this book, to get a glimpse into what they really are like.
Lastly, Salomon Brothers went through a lot more turbulent phase after the publication of the book. That’s just to give you some perspective. If you thought Salomon Brothers trading floor was a hell hole… it got worse. So stop cribbing about your job… unless you are one of them.

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Globalization and Its Discontents - Joseph Stiglitz

Joseph Stiglitz is a Nobel Laureate for Economics, 2001. And I thought, well, if he has an opinion on the problems of globalization, I might as well listen. The blurb says – From a leader of the anti-globalization movement, a statement like this [how globalization is not working] would not be remarkable. But coming from Joseph Stiglitz – former Chief Economist at the Worlkd Bank – it is startling and challenging. Exactly my opinion. And the Chief economist was also the Chairman of President Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisors. And if anyone would have a pro-globalization agenda, it would be him, considering his loyalties.
But the author doesn’t have any loyalties so to speak. And he raises his voice as an economist working towards the “greater good”. He analyzes the failings of globalization in varied situations; which leads to the revelation that it is not globalization in itself which has failed, but the manner in which “Globalization” has been imposed on countries not ready for it, through economic and political pressures, or downright blackmail if one were to not mince words.
At some point the book does tend to get repetitive and feels like it is basically a vent to bash IMF. But then whatever the motive of the author, the theories as proposed by the author do seem very credible. I would love to read a counter-view of the author’s allegations against the IMF.
The most disturbing chapter would be the “The IMF’s other agenda”, where the author suggests that IMF, more than acting to bring about a global financial stability, is working for the benefit of “international financial community”. And international financial community for all practical purposes translates to the global mammoth banks and other financial organizations. This does provide a lot sense behind the actions of IMF during the financial crises across South East Asia, Mexico, or Russia. The stand of IMF on trade deficits, fiscal deficits, interest rates, monetary policies, etc. which seem without any reason or logic, with the new agenda in mind, seem perfectly logical. And this is alarming. If we have an international organization working with a bias, it cannot be good for the world.
The book ends with the hope of promise, which is just as good, since the overall picture looks extremely grim and gloomy. A lot of things that matter so much to us seem so paltry and trivial in the larger scheme of things. And the world desperately needs who have the intent and the authority to set things right at the larger stage. It’s a question of yours and mine daily bread.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Mirror Mirror - Mark Pendergast

This book took a long time for me to read. Somehow, work, inter-city travel and some more work kept digging potholes and constructing road blocks to stop me from getting through the book. But I fought it all and kept going. And it was worth every bit of it.
Non-fiction books will always be a tricky affair. I don’t think someone who doesn’t read books could have got through a book like this, or for that matter any science history book. But for any bibliophile, this book would be immensely pleasurable. If you are an astronomer then too, this book will serve up a history of your subject in an entirely different perspective.
The book is essentially a history of mirrors. And what a fascinating history it is! The author explores the topic beautifully, right from the BC era to the 21st century, the journey of the mirror from being an extremely rare, expensive and a prized possession when mirror makers were imprisoned to keep their talents within Vienna, to something extremely commonplace; from being a simple reflector of Roman orgies to a devastating weapon. And along the journey, the evolution of human interaction with mirrors in various stages is equally fascinating. The impact of mirrors in painting, literature, astronomy, optical sciences, communications, psychology is astounding. Legend has it that Archimedes burnt enemy ships using a concave reflecting mirror by focusing sun rays to an enemy. It’s not exactly proven whether mirror was used as a weapon then, but now, lasers are quite a popular in weapon sciences. Telescopes have got bigger, better, and are equipped to capture more than just visible light from million of light years away, or light emitted as early as the big bang. And lastly people have changed the way they look at mirrors. From being a simple polished metal, to a scrying for psychic knowledge, to an inseparable fashion accessory, and finally to a ‘true mirror’ which reflects us as we are seen by others is a long journey indeed.
The book charts all these territories and more. The heroes and villains of the story are enumerated exceptionally well. And there are too many of them to mention here. But various people have contributed to the development of mirror, be it in terms of manufacturing them with various materials, or giving them a particular shape, to their applications in earth and space, in various wavelengths of emissions.
Last word is that it is a truly fascinating book about something so commonplace that you hardly think about it. Imagine, there are ‘true mirrors’ which are available which actually do not show a reversed image when you stand in front of it. So that, it shows you how you would appear to other people. That is so extremely against the intuition as far as gazing into a mirror is concerned, and at the same time so novel an experience! I wish I could see myself in a true mirror! The book is an excellent product of some tremendous research and great writing style. Without adequate research the book would have ended up being a hodge-podge mixture of arbitrary information about mirrors. And without great writing style, it could have been reduced to a boring, soporific history text-book. It has all the necessary elements to make a fun read for anyone with a curious mind.

Thursday, April 2, 2009

The Plot to Get Bill Gates - Gary Rivlin

There must be sundry books on Bill Gates. And most books on other Information Technology luminaries will have a mention of their tussle with him. Bill Gates is an extremely well marketed a commodity. Not that he needed much marketing with his tagline of ‘the richest man in the world’. But one of the four P’s of marketing, packaging, was a crucial element. And that is one of the things the author dwells in in one of the chapters.

The book, if you really go to see about it, is about the success of Microsoft, and Bill Gates, with a twist. It focuses on the adversaries and builds the identity of hero by describing the foes he fought. And while it is up to the reader to decide this, but I genuinely felt that it wasn’t a book written with the Microsoft agenda at the back of the mind. Or it could have been the part of Bill Gates ver 4 that the author talks about. You never know.

The book starts at 1994 with ‘The Agenda’ an annual technological event which attracts the who’s who of the technology world, and where Bill Gates is a constant celebrity despite the power quotient of the attendees. From there the book goes back to the genesis of Microsoft and the a rapid coverage of Microsoft’s ascendance in the industry. Again, the spotlight is not on Microsoft as much as on the competition of IBM and Digital Research and Novell and the rest of them, which gives a fresh perspective to the battles of the bytes. Maybe it would have been more fun if the duel between Microsoft and Apple had been brought out better. But it probably wasn’t as much of a duel as Apple as a corporation and its cult followers believe it to be.

The second phase of the book is about the race in the internet-world where Microsoft was a late starter. Scott McNealy of Sun, Larry Ellison of Oracle and Marc Andreesson of Netscape were the primary enemies with their Java, NC (Network Computer) and Netscape browser. Again, the book livens up with the flamboyant lifestyle of Ellison, the raw aggressiveness of McNealy, and the arrogance of folks at Netscape as Microsoft bulldozes through the competitors.

The last section is an acknowledgement of the sheer dominance of Microsoft in the industry, a detailed write up on the anti-trust suit against Microsoft, and an actual Anti-Bill fund set up by his competitors. Well, it was actually called the Java Fund, but thwarting Bill Gates was the whole point of it!

The book is fascinatingly entertaining, as it narrates the anecdotes and the interviews. Anyone with a flair for business and interest in the computer world will surely love the book. Having been published in 2000, maybe it’s lost a lot of its relevance in 2009, but it sure would have made a great read the year it was published. Not that I regretted reading the book, but it does feel a bit incomplete to read a book which talks about Operating Systems, and internet and leaves out Google. A question of timing I suppose. But that does not make this book, considering the subject it was written on, any lesser a read. I would rate it highly, if not for its recentness, then for its historical perspective. (20 years back is almost dinosaur age in the hi-tech)

Lastly, the book is not all about gushing praise for Bill Gates. And Gary Rivlin doesn’t mince words when he paints a portrait of Bill Gates from Microsoft Co-founder to the Chief Software Architect of his company. And neither is the author overly critical of the business ambition that drove Bill Gates to be what he ended up being. The quote that the books opens with, says it all. And it was a delightful read throughout.

Sunday, February 1, 2009

A Beautiful Mind - Sylvia Nasar

It would be exaggerating to say that I have read a lot of biographies, but the fact remains that I do love reading them. The objective of reading a biography is not just entertainment that you would seek from a fiction novel, nor general knowledge of topics that interest you that you gather from non-fiction books. A biography gives a peek into the subject’s life. And a good biography will not just narrate the events of a subject’s life chronologically but will present the most significant events with sufficient background and detail to convey a message that is a learning for a reader to conduct his life. It is like reading a real live fable. Only the moral is a lot more complex and multi faceted than say “slow and steady wins the race”.

Whose life merits a biography? I guess no right answer there. Everyone’s life is interesting, noble laureate or not. But there are some who are capable on inspiring the readers with the tale of their lives like no self-help book ever can. Some are great exposes of political and other machinations which a layman will never otherwise learn. And these books more often than not end up being banned. Some are funny. And some are poignant and serve to sensitize the readers to things that they would be very indifferent to. A Beautiful Mind falls in multiple categories depending on your perspective. John Nash, by no means, is an inspiring character really. But his wife Alicia is. And the life of a schizophrenic person is something that people who have not encountered it will never understand. And making movies stereotyping schizophrenia forms a very harmful image of the disorder in the society. It’s a topic which needs to be tackled sensitivity. Something that the book conveys extremely well. And the rallying of Nash’s colleagues around him in his time of despair that just gives me so much hope that the world isn’t as bad a place as I sometimes think it is.

The story of John Nash’s life plays out like a novel. I will not comment about the research since I am not qualified enough for that, but as a lay reader, the entertainment quotient, for the want of a better phrase, of the book was like a fiction drama. No wonder it made for such a great movie adaptation. Nash’s history, his blossoming as a mathematician, decline during his disorder, and finally his recovery has been depicted beautifully. His relationships with his family, colleagues, students and how they impacted his life in both good ways and bad is borne out clearly. Nash is not played out as the hero. He only is the central character is the book. The author tells all about his life without trying to bring John Nash out as the good guy all the time. His flaws are plentiful, and there is no mincing of words while bringing them out. Most importantly, his paranoid schizophrenia is not over dramatized for the sake of gripping the reader. It is tackled with sensitivity and treated as an affliction that John Nash and the people in his life together battled out, not always agreeing about the course of action, but with a single aim nonetheless.

I will highly recommend this book for people who like biographies. If you don’t, maybe the movie will suffice, but be warned that the movie captures one-tenth of what the book has to offer. And if you think John Nash was just another scientist or just another schizophrenic patient, you are gravely mistaken. The fact that he is both together, and the fact that the scientist Nash won against the schizophrenic Nash, is what sets his life apart. If we can help anyone achieve that, you would have done your bit for humanity.

Thursday, December 25, 2008

Phantoms In The Brain - V.S. Ramachandran

This book was a recommendation by a friend. And boy was it a great reco.
It’s very easy to fall into the trap of assuming that like all medical books, this one, being on neurology, is as boring, dull, with unnecessary medical jargons and details. You couldn’t be more wrong. The author candidly confesses about how medical authors could get into that mould and steers clear of it. And while some details of the brain structure are required, no where does it get too lengthy for you to lose interest.
The book is not really an expedition to teach the laymen the working of the brains. But what it serves to do is elucidate us with the fact that a lot of strange behavior that we ignore, or worse, viciously hate, are no more than physical shortcomings of the brain. That, therefore, would merit some sympathy from the normal section of the society who can differentiate a vertical mail slot from a horizontal one and who do not see cartoons and animals out there in the world.
It is indeed very moving to read about some of the problems people have when some interconnections of the brain go awry. Imagine the fear of the lady whose left hand (or was it right?) kept trying to strangle her. Or like Memento or Ghajini, this guy could not form any new memories. There are a lot of cases described in the book. And the least we could do is be sensitive to their problems.
The book starts off with the discussion on phantom limbs, something that I wasn’t aware of before I read this book! What a strange concept, isn’t it, for the brain to think that an amputated leg or a hand, or even removed breasts, still exist! And to register physical signals to those phantom body parts! The entire genesis, problems, potential cure for the phantom limbs is beautifully explained. And did you know that when a body part gets amputated, physical stimulation on other parts will make you feel that something is touching that missing body part. For example, if someone gets a hand amputated, and if you run a feather on a section of his face, he will feel that your brushing his palm. What a strange thing the human brain is, isn’t it?
The book tackles phantom limbs, and other strange aspects of brain functioning, like visual responses, neglect and denial symptoms, the part of brain that gives you a religious experience (it’s grossly under-developed in me) and concludes with the question of how to define the “Self” in context of the brain. The last chapter is the only one where it gets really heavy and the discussion is a mixture of philosophy as much as it is about neurology. But then, that’s the nature of brain and how we live and think isn’t it?
Think Matrix. There a whole pseudo world was created was created for people by feeding electrical signals to the brain. Does then, consciousness have any meaning? No one is doing anything really, but they are living a complete life lying in a tube.
This book will make you look at life a lot more humbly. We are all a function of our brain. But how it reacts is a function of us. It’s a relationship hard to comprehend. And I really believe that the whole exercise, however intellectually stimulating, is completely futile. But then neurology can not be completely objective with it’s only aim being curing brain ailments. Philosophy is bound to get mixed up. And in this book, V.S. Ramachandran coexists peacefully with Freud.

Sunday, November 30, 2008

The Corporation that Changed the World - Nick Robins


Well… I didn’t really finish this book, because I carelessly forgot it in a flight I took from Mumbai to Bangalore… but I had read around 80% of the book so am in a position to comment about the book.

The reason I bought this book is to read up into the history of East India Company and their stance with respect to India. The history books in the school dwelt on the Maratha era and then passed on to the 1857 mutiny and there on to the Independence struggle with only a cursory mention about the impact of the East India Company on the nation from a economic and a political perspective. The only thing that was communicated was the atrocities committed on the Indians under the rule of East India Company and then the British Raj. What this book offers is a proper blend of the rise of East India Company, their functioning, their political and social impact not just in India but globally, and their eventual demise.

The good thing is that the author has managed to keep out any bias while presenting the historical facts. He maintains the business book feel while discussing the operations of East India Company as he compares their functioning, the organizational structure, the capital raising mechanisms and the rampant malpractices of the Company with the modern day organization.

The book gives sufficient detail for a person like me who wants to read on the subject more out of curiosity and for high level information. The writing is entertaining and is not boring in a text book way. It does not mince words about the cruelty that the Britishers subjected the Indians to and how methodically they ruined the entire country’s economy. This is the first business book that sparked my patriotic fury. And it did well to remind me of the struggle that India as a nation has been through to be free from the clutches of the foreign power. All the post-independence rhetoric, however clichéd, strikes true. We as Indians, have struggled for long. It’s about time we did not get carried away with the rampant westernization and rose to the riches of the pre-East-India era, where while there were inter-ruler wars, the per-capita income for the common man, was much higher. It’s high time we stopped being a poor nation.

Friday, September 19, 2008

The Physics of Superheroes – James Kakalios

Have you ever been so fascinated by a superhero that you try to get yourself bitten by a spider so as to be able to swing from one high rise building to another, regardless of the fact that those spiders were neither genetically mutated through exposure to radiation nor are there that many high rise buildings in the city that you live in?

Well I have been. That probably explains why I liked this particular book so much. This book will be enjoyed by the following grades of people, in the descending order:
1. People who love superhero comic books and love physics
2. Superhero Comic Book Lovers
3. Physics lovers

I belong to the first kind. And so does James Kakalios. The difference being that he is actually a physicist.

The author goes about exploring one physics aspect after another, in more or less increasing amount of complexity of the concept and uses superheroes as and when required to show how comic books got their physics surprisingly right or ridiculously wrong. So there are lessons on mechanics, thermodynamics, electricity, magnetism and lastly quantum physics with the superheroes that use the fundamentals respectively thrown in. If I am making it sound as if the book focuses more on physics than on superheroes, I wouldn’t be entirely wrong. Because the book does explain some concepts quite at length. That said it is not in a boring, class notes kind of a way and loaded with mathematical equations. The sense of humour is retained through the book. Even while explaining Schrodinger's equation. (A picture of a smiling scientist, coupled with the fact that he was somewhat of a Casanova will cheer you up even in your grumpiest mood)

Another very pleasing aspect of the book is that it dwells into quite a bit of history of comic books as it explores the physics side of things. That gives a lot of interesting trivia which any comic book lover would love to be abreast with. Did you know the earlier Superman could not fly and was only able to jump great heights and his source of powers was not the Sun but because he hailed from Krypton which had a supposedly stronger gravitational field. (After calculations, Kakalios determines the gravitational force of Krypton to be 15 times stronger than that of Earth’s) That and many more interesting tit-bits from the Comic Books hall of history are showcased in the book.

Overall, Kakalios keeps a nice balance between science, history and most importantly superheroes. Even Quantum Physics is explained in an absolutely layman’s language and how superheroes like Flash and Kitty Pryde use such complex principles. The book keeps getting better and better as you turn the pages over and ends with a brilliant closing chapter on Superhero bloopers.

So read it for superheroes, or read it for physics, you should have fun. You probably wouldn’t enjoy it if you are not into either of them. But then, if you are neither of them, this book is not meant for you. And as far as I am concerned, I am the target market for who the book was written.

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Maverick - Ricardo Semler

This is a business book with a difference! For one, it is not about a multi billion dollar corporation like, say an Exon, or Microsoft. It is about a Brazilian company, called Semco. And the second key difference is, the author, also the owner of the company, does not boast about the good things in his organization. He is proud of them.

Well the theme of the book is pretty straightforward. A successful company in a sinusoidal economy, and an owner with a strain of megalomania in him and therefore he decides to write a book. Well, I excuse the writer for the megalomania bit. Because this is one company that did merit a book. Not as much because it was successful, but because the company believes in the philosophy of, as we say, ‘having a life’.

Semco has done a lot of things differently. Corporate democracy where the employees decide everything from the color of the office walls to the time they come to work to even their salaries is a unique concept implemented by Semco. That, broadly, forms the theme of the book. It also explains, why, despite the obvious on-the-face, impossibility of giving such a freedom to employees, the scheme does work. I will not detail the stories of the company. There are just too many and all of them are just too good to choose amongst them.

The owner, Ricardo Semler, is a man I have tremendous respect for! In the modern era of cut throat competition it is fashionable to be a workaholic. Ricardo, or Dickie, disagrees. It’s not that he shuns work. Or doesn’t have a business vision. But it’s just that he realizes that having fun in life is more important. And honestly, workaholics are only living a delusion that work is actually fun for them. I ramble. Back to Dickie. He takes a two month of every year for vacations, believes that watching a movie on a Monday afternoon is a lot more commendable than working on a Saturday, and he actually is proud of the fact that most of the decisions in the company are taken by others and he is not even invited to most meetings, actually documents that he doesn’t take a whole lot of calls he gets… man… I could go on, and you would get the picture of that good for nothing work-weasel guy out of Dilbert comics. But then, Ricardo Semler does run a company. A successful one at that. And though he is not invited to meetings, knows about his business. So he is not a Jack Welch. But he sure as hell is a lot more interesting.

A lot of business books get very pedantic. Suggesting that what they do is the best in the world and everyone should adopt their ways. The only thing it does is feed the egos of the management of that company. And Maverick holds its reins tightly enough to not fall into that cliff. Eventually, granting that there would be a whole lot of things that people in Semco crib about, it still seems like a fun place to work for! So for the people who might not get a chance, the book is the next best way of learning how a company ought to function. This really is a business book with a difference.

Clash of the Titans - Richard Hack

I have always enjoyed business books. Maybe it’s because I have done an MBA. (I know that sounds snobbish, but when you study business management, learning how, say, a Microsoft or a Google become the mammoth that it is, is actually quite thrilling. My love for business books is a different topic altogether) But all business books that I had read so far were about businesses that I more or less understood. Or if not understood, at least I could grasp. Say technology, or Consumer Goods, or Retail. It’s about making something, and selling it.

And when I started on with Clash of the Titans, I was quite enthused about expanding my horizons and reading about a new business, namely media. The book is about the clash of the two titans in the media world, Rupert Murdoch, and Ted Turner. Both incredible business men who have touched my lives quite personally in their own ways. Murdoch through his Times of India, and Ted Turner through Cartoon Network. This is not to say that Star Sports or Star Movies or HBO or their other ventures haven’t been a part of my life, but their influence was certainly considerably lesser.

Richard Hack tries to give the book as fictional a feel as possible. Through his non-sequential narration of starting with an episode midway in the chronology, then going back to the beginning to come back to the start of the book again. That’s a ploy done to death, but it still holds its charm. And then there is (over-)dramatization of several scenes, the details which can not possibly be confirmed with regards to their accuracy. And while the purpose of it to not render the book boring is accomplished, the author does go overboard by ending every chapter with “… and the tides had turned for the two giants to collide in a feisty storm” or lines to that effect.

As such Clash of The Titans is as much a business book as it is a compressed biography of Rupert Murdoch and Ted Turner, juxtaposed brilliantly. There the book is something unique, and reads almost like a movie screen play. Both Ted Turner and Rupert Murdoch have led incredible lives and have built incredible companies. The book traces the life of both these protagonists in the right amount of detail required in the context of the book.

The business side of it is actually not that easy to follow. Or maybe it was because I don’t really understand the business of media. And how exactly Murdoch and Turner become business men of their stature is not very clear. As given in the book: Murdoch buys newspapers after newspapers (as in the publishing companies and not stacks of newspapers) and ensures they become profitable and Turner has TBS and then starts CNN which is a hit. I am oversimplifying what’s there in the book of course, but the book itself oversimplifies their rise to stardom as well. There’s this whole thing of network versus cable versus dish antenna TV which I absolutely did not get. (Time for some Googling) But then the book, at 400 pages, probably did not have enough space to dwell into more details.

The two things that absolutely do stand out for me though are that one, Both Murdoch and Turner have an unending zest for life and want to keep setting goals and achieving them. The book portrays the passion that the two men have, extremely well. Secondly, as constant a character as Murdoch has been through his life, Turner has taken a somersault and turned himself inside out. Murdoch’s priorities have been fairly uniform through his life. Turner’s have changed drastically. Murdoch was always a business man through out his life. Turner was a sailor, a Casanova, an orator, a philanthropist, and a businessman, each in varying amounts in different phases of his life.

The book does an exceptional job of providing glimpses into the lives and businesses of Ted Turner and Rupert Murdoch, a commendable job when writing about either would have constituted quite a tome itself. That itself makes this book a highly recommended read.

The Code Book - Simon Singh

I have absolutely no clue as to why I picked up this book. It wasn’t spectacularly cheap. The book is a narration on cryptography and how it has evolved over time. So the subject is nothing that I have ever been interested in. It was certainly not going to help me in my career in any way. But yet… I picked it up. Perhaps it was the cover. It is indeed a very well designed cover, great title, great tag line, and the overall look is the kind that promises answers to a lot of mysteries of life. (It is quite mystical, the way the sub-conscious works and drives us to do things that we think we wouldn’t do) What a cardinal sin! I judged a book by its cover! For once though, I was right on the money.

The book is, as I said, on cryptography, which, for the uninitiated, is the science of manipulating messages so that only the intended receiver can understand them. The book could have been very text-bookish, with one method of encryption explained after another. But Simon Singh displays the flair of an accomplished novelist in the book as he narrates the growth of cryptography over the ages like a riveting story.

The author talks about cryptography as a battle between cryptographers and cryptanalysts, i.e. the code-makers and the code-breakers. One is the good and the other evil, depending on the side you happen to be. Therefore, the book almost has a screen play like a movie, with the focus not on the protagonist or the villain, but on the actual battle. Of course the code makers and breakers are given their due credit. But what is fascinating is the process of cryptography and the enormous impact it has had on the world we live in. So be it the simple mono-alphabetic substitution cipher which took a couple of centuries to break, or the Vignere cipher which was considered unbreakable, or be it the Enigma, the mechanical cipher, which presented a challenge to the cryptanalysts like never before. All these were eventually broken and we saw the coming of the public key cryptography, something that is used in the present day, which will be broken, only when quantum computers are ready to join the party, or so the author claims. The whole evolution makes for an absorbing read. There is a slight detour that the author takes to describe how ancient languages were deciphered, which is quite intriguing as well. To think that there are people smart enough to figure out how a language was actually “spoken” just by studying some written texts makes me feel so mediocre about myself! And as the author unfolds all these scientific details about cryptography and cryptanalysis, he makes it a point to keep it simple for the laymen like me, and sprinkles a healthy dose of anecdotes to keep the reader entertained.

The author displays an amazing intuitive understanding of a reader’s psyche. Loading the book with facts would have been dreary, because we are not going to remember the dates and the names anyways. (Atleast I don’t) Having only the cryptographic details would have made the book as dull as a text-book, as I have already pointed out. And having only entertaining anecdotes would have made the book a collection of articles from a tabloid with no light being shed on the cryptography part of it. To balance all the three components so that the reader feels absolutely satisfied when she finishes the book is quite a daunting task, and Simon Singh has achieved that beautifully.

So what if you have nothing to do with cryptography? If you ever wanted some entertaining non-fiction, The Code Book is the book for you. And oh, in case you manage to solve the Beale Mystery which the author talks about, you might just end up becoming a millionaire. Now are you interested?

Thursday, August 7, 2008

The Dragon and The Elephant - David Smith

It’s interesting to note that the author chooses to represent China and India with a dragon and an elephant respectively. Size, power and perhaps fury captured well by the representative creatures. The book after all, is about the Chinese and Indian economies, their fall from their glorious history to very recent, but endemic, poverty, and their rising impact in the global economy in the more recent times.

Most books on economics, especially the ones about countries at a specific point in time tend to have a very short shelf life. They are applicable only for a few years after which they are published. This is especially true in the more dynamic times of today. But this particular book would make for a good read well into the future for its historical perspective. It provides a very good sneak-peek into the history of Chinese and Indian Economies and its journey for over 2000 years, the last 50 years or so being obviously more detailed.

The book then goes about discussing the impact of the two giants on the world economy. Overall, this section provides some useful details to the more generic knowledge an average Joe might have. Indeed, the author cites just the right number of examples and facts and figures too convey his point. He could easily have been carried away, but he doesn’t wander away from the theme of the book.

Lastly the book takes a predictive tone as the author states the ten ways in which China and India will impact the world. The author is careful not to over-state things, and is neither overly optimistic nor an alarmist in his visions of China, India and the world in 2050.

As a reader, you will appreciate that the author doesn’t patronize anything about either of the two countries and neither does he take a pro-western or a pro-globalization or pro-anything stance through the book. The book is very simply and completely about what the title suggests. The book serves a very good purpose in giving the people who are getting increasingly aware of the China and India, and maybe would also help to shatter some myths and stereotypes about the countries. After all, they are more than just about the dragons and elephants.

The Theory of Everything - Stephen Hawking

The theory of everything is an interesting concept in itself. I always was intrigued by the idea of origin of universe and its growth. Apparently a lot of people have been interested in it other than me. And their interest has been a lot more active than mine. As it turns out everything that happens can be expressed as mathematical equations. Or at least people have been trying to. I knew “A brief history of time by Stephen Hawking” dwells on the subject too. I just chose to read this book because it had lesser number of pages. And I wanted a summary of the history of time and could do without the technicalities.

But then, even this smaller book is quite dense. You need to have a healthy amount of curiosity to be able to get through this book. In the end, it doesn’t answer any specific question you might have on the universe. In fact, Stephen Hawking is blissfully diplomatic about most things. And there are just so many things in the book that are confusing… obfuscating even. (I forget that character who talked like that)

The topics discussed in this book cover origin of universe and several arguments and theories about it, its growth till the present state, black holes, time and its direction and the concluding chapter on the quest for theory of everything. The good thing is that the book is in English. And even though a lot of concepts are brought in which I didn’t fully understand, the partial understanding of the theme was good enough for me to read this book.

Stephen Hawking mixes philosophy with science very well. And surprisingly, exhibits quite a sense of subtle humor in this science laden book. He puts forth a point that science was once a branch under philosophy. It was when science just got too complicated for the philosophers that it needed specialized studies. The idea is to read this book like a philosopher, and if you have some amount of interest in astronomy. If you don’t, don’t bother going through this one. You will probably get a headache in the first 2 pages.

To end it, the book does not actually give the theory which encompasses everything. It ends with a note that a grand unifying theory will probably emerge from a chain of theories which will sprout over time. And once the “how” of the world is answered… we can go about asking “why”. As I said, deeply philosophical

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

I Dare - Biography of Kiran Bedi


The most important woman in India according to a magazine, high achiever in this male dominated jungle of a planet, and the person who transformed Tihar Jail: that was the extent about my knowledge about Kiran Bedi, a woman a lot of other women and girls tout as their role model. So, I thought the biography would be a good place to read up about her. After all, she was a cop. And therefore her life was bound to be a lot more interesting than an IT professional. Plus, the book advertised itself by claiming to be the best biography of an Indian. And though I couldn’t recall any other significant biographies from India, I was fairly certain that even considering the lack of competition the book, if not good, wouldn’t be too bad.

To that end, I was right. The book was not bad. And yeah, Kiran Bedi’s life has been quite “happening”, as the hippies might have said. First woman IPS officer, now that’s quite an achievement isn’t it. Something I would have been proud as a parent, a teacher, a friend, a neighbour, or even as her building watchman. Truly, it is so convenient to generalize that this or that is not a girl’s domain. Disproving that requires tremendous dedication, and conviction to battle the cynicism, the doubts, and even ridicule. To say that Kiran Bedi did battle all of that to have a phenomenally respectful career as an IPS officer is to say a lot. Hats off Miss Kiran Bedi!

But then, as a biography this book seriously lacks in quality. Not that I have read many non-business biographies, but I am sure the writing could have been way better. It reads like someone is literally penning down the things as they happened in Kiran Bedi’s life chronologically without giving a thought to the aesthetics of writing. It fails to play with the readers’ emotions, to cause them to flare at the bureaucracy in the Indian System, or cringe at the simply inhuman crimes against the people jailed at Tihar, or simply feel sad for the people who wait for years to even get a sentence and spend time in prison as undertrials. There are some feeble attempts here and there to do that. But they are too far and few in between to praise the quality of writing. Two things could have happened. One, maybe the creative freedom of the author was curtailed, and he was told about the things to write. Or, the writer found that her name would not be mentioned on the cover page and got seriously ticked off by that to put effort into the book. (The book that I have does not have the author name on the cover. The picture of the revised edition I have put up here, does mention the name! Atleast they revised that!) I have a feeling it is the first. Probably Kiran Bedi herself micro-managed the book too much for it to be a piece of literature. And the book at places seems to be a vent to give justification, or to complain against the injustice against her. And the book does seem quite self laudatory for it to be an honest biography.
Final word… yes the book is a worthy read for the sheer personality of Kiran Bedi. Writing pulchritude be damned. The life story of Kiran Bedi keeps you riveted, and the pages keep turning. And you do feel glad that you have such an officer in the system.

Sunday, July 13, 2008

The Debt Threat - Noreena Hertz

Economics has always appealed to not only my intellectual side but my artistic senses as well. Well, I am not a PhD intellectual or anything, and neither is my artistic side heightened to the levels of Picasso. But I still enjoy any book or article or discourse which might have leanings on either the brainy side, or the aesthetic side. And economics for me spreads on both sides of the spectrum. Debt is one among the many financial and economic creations of mankind, which by its very nature is a piece of art really, and requires a mammoth intelligence to understand fully its ramifications.

And Noreena Hertz explores the threatening implications that international debt has in her book. Even if one is not aware of the global economics, you don’t even have to be a whiz to guess what the term “debt threat” might imply. It is very easy to dismiss the book as one more alarmist piece of literature… like global warming or something else.

But I would beg to differ. For one, the author is aware that she might be regarded as a pessimist and an alarmist when she lists the evilness of debts. Secondly the book is not just about how debt is killing a horde of people in poor countries. It is a complete piece of research on how the whole cycle of debt became vicious in nature, how are the countries suffering because of that, what are the outcomes, and the remedies as well. It is a complicated issue, one does realize. And as Bono (yeah, the U2 rockstar) succinctly puts it, the author does do a commendable job on cutting out the acronyms and making this whole issue a lot more understandable for the non-economists but at the same time are concerned about the well being of the world.

The examples in this book seem to be very repetitive. It is one country after another, suffering under the weight of debt their governments has taken. Some dictatorships have taken debts just to lead a comfortable life for themselves, some governments have taken debts to make weapons, some to destroy forests in an attempt to save the economy, and some simply to service older debts. And these examples take the book perilously close to that dreaded “alarmist” tag. But those examples are just to strengthen the point that the author is trying to make. And while perhaps slightly overused, they are not out of place and definitely not unneeded.

The high point of the book is that the author gives a practical way out. Now, as I said, I am no PhD to really say whether her ways are practical. But as a normal civilian, I find the thought process and the logic sound. And as the author herself says, what she has given in the book is a blueprint, a suggestion at a high-level which needs to be refined and chiseled at to come out with policies to thwart the debt threat.
Having said that, though the book speaks about a topic which everyone should know of which itself would go a long way to mobilize public opinion, the book might be a bit heavy for absolutely everyone to read. Maybe if there could be a series of articles in the newspaper… or some other marketing ploy which would increase the target audience manifold would help. While not everyone might have an appetite for books, a newspaper article might be up for grabs. And the more the people are aware of this issue, the better

It Happened in India - Kishore Biyani

Finally a business book from India! And no, it did not come from the Tata’s or Birla’s or Ambani’s. It has come from the reasonably unlikely quarters of Biyanis. Actually it is just one Biyani that is famous yet: Kishore Biyani, the first generation business man who has given retail in India the shape it is in. Sure we don’t know how are Pantaloons and Big Bazars and other ventures of Kishore Biyani going to shape up in the wake of Reliance Retail and foreign players. And neither did Kishore Biyani set up the first mall in the country. But he could still be heralded as the Father of Indian Retail simply because he has, as Malcolm Gladwell would say, “Tipped” the retail industry in India. He has taken malls from the domain of the elitist to the masses. And even though the business of Kishore Biyani is minuscule compared to Walmart or Tatas, he has achieved a tremendous amount, enough to warrant an autobiography of his business life.

And true to his style, this book by Kishore Biyani was meant for the masses. It was released in paperback, and priced at Rs. 99. Which is the least I have paid for a business book ever!

However, a good business man, and a thriving business operation, does not necessarily a good business book make! That is exactly what has happened here. The book oversimplifies the whole business a bit too much for the reader to grasp the complexities of the business environment, that too, in a sector which is otherwise dominated by the unorganized players. The best business books tend to chart the journey of everyone involved, capturing sufficient detail to convey the challenges of the business without over doing it which would bore the reader. It’s a fine line to tread. And this book is on the simpler side of the line. It misses that investigative journalistic touch and the business details. Perhaps if an independent author had written a book instead of Kishore Biyani himself, assisted by a writer, he might have done a better job.

Having said that, the book does give glimpses of the Indian Retail scenario. And even the brief insights are quite a delight to read. The growth of the business itself, and the thoughts of Kishore Biyani at every juncture and inflection point for his company are quite well narrated. The anecdotes and comments by people who have worked with Kishore Biyani… umm… well there are too many of them and most are generic praises that anyone could shower on anyone. But then, some of them highlight specific facets of Kishore Biyani’s business style and acumen, and they cover up for all the other write-ups which are plain flattery.
The book is not really written for the B-school audiences. It is meant to fire up that entrepreneurial spark in the people who are looking for a hero to emulate. And yes, Kishore Biyani is a source of bucketfuls of inspiration for such young guns. This book will be more than vindicated if it manages to produce even a single Kishore Biyani in this country of over 1 billion people.

The Game - Neil Strauss

Every once in a while you come across a book, or a movie, or some other vastly influencing phenomenon, which shakes up your belief system and your outlook towards world, people and life. At times, in fact, the only kind of things which achieve that and you hear about, are spiritual in nature. But here I present a book as far away from spirituality as possible. It talks about manipulation of others, faking our identity and a lot of sex. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I present to you a book which gave me an insight into a world so vastly different from which I live in, so exciting and “happening” than my own boring life that I am tempted, like the author, to give up my day job and dive into it.

The sub-title, “Penetrating the secret society of pick-up artists” and the silhouettes of women on the title pretty much give away the theme. And while ability to charm a woman that one wants, anytime, any day, is a fantasy that all guys would have, I detest self-help books and was in no mood for any kind of pedagogy on how to improve my personality so girls would flock around me. However, the book is not about what a lot of people might believe it to be: a lesson on how to pick up girls. It is in fact an expose of the whole underground pick-up community.

Neil Strauss is given an assignment to write a proper book on the lines of a crude How-To-Lay-Girls-Guide. From that point he plunges into the pick-up cult, with the instinct of an author and the desperation of a single horny long-time-no-sex guy. Within two years, Style, Neil’s pickup alias, becomes the best pick-up artist there is.

But then, Neil, or Style if you prefer, had a mission and a job. He did not see pick-up as a be-all-end-all of his life. So he could draw lines and have control over his life unlike a lot of other people he met. And by drawing these lines he gives us a view into the pick-up society like an undercover journalist. True, Neil had become Style, but the Neil was never killed. In fact, Neil was the one who was really in control all the time. And it is Neil who wrote this fantastic book.

The book is extremely candid in its portrayal of everyone and everything. Being regarded as the best, and as someone who people actually looked up to in the community probably made it easier for Neil Strauss. But the credit for that too goes to the author. And the book traces the whole journey of Style from being a babe-repeller nerd to a master-Pick-up-Artist (mPUA) to being in love. The book talks about various characters that the author interacted with in this two year span from Tom Cruise and Britney Spears to other mPUAs and his students in The Game. It gives away the techniques used to pick-up girls, it gives the pickup lingo, it gives away the politicking in the community as it grew hundred-fold and it gives the hollowness that eventually hit Style in his quest for gaining the ability to lay girls at will. Neil Strauss writes about what is going on in his head at every single juncture. That makes a fantastically truthful autobiography for the reader.

The book is written amazingly. The colloquial nature of the book makes it even more appealing. The writer draws on some well placed quotes, his own high school poetry and the posts of the pick-up community members in their online chat-room. All of it is packaged brilliantly. At no point does the book become pedantic, or resentful or boring. This is how books ought to be written.

When I finished the book, the first thing I did was I googled some of the names in the book: Mystery, Tyler Durden, Ross Jefferies… and hell they all are for real. I ran into a gazillion pick-up sites. Looks like the whole pick-up thing is commoditized and commercialized beyond repair. That is what Neil himself realized and got out of the game.
In the end you learn a valuable lesson as a reader. Sure guys are sex-maniacs. And so what if such under-ground communities for pick-up training exist, they are really just fulfilling a market demand. The bottom line is how you present yourself that will make people, and girls, like you. You have to internalize a lot of things, because fake simply doesn’t work. That is a one page advice that you will find spread across the first half of the book. The rest of the book is simply about how messed up life can get if you take these things too seriously. Go ahead, read this book. It will teach as much about the contemporary life as a spiritual scripture might.